Provided that a teacher whose date of superannuation does not fall on June 30, shall continue on service till the end of the academic session, that is June 30, following and will be treated as on re-employment from the date immediately following his superannuation till June 30, following. Thirdly, and importantly the proviso {to Statute 16.24 (2)} carves out an exception to the main provision, inasmuch as it provides that a teacher whose “date of superannuation does not fall on June 30, shall continue in service till the end of the academic session, that is June 30, following and will be treated as on re-employment from the date immediately following his superannuation till June, 30, following.””. The Division Bench said that Statute No. (1958) [Ch] 574), there is well-established authority for the view that a decision of long standing on the basis of which many persons will in the course of time have arranged their affairs should not lightly be disturbed by a superior court not strictly bound itself by the decision.””, SC Bench then very rightly holds in para 14 that, “This Court is consequently of the opinion that the impugned judgment is in error. A bench headed by Justice R F Nariman said the monitoring committee will continue its work till the case is heard on August 7. The Supreme Court today ordered the State of Maharashtra not to cut any further trees in Aarey and maintain the status quo till the next date of hearing. To put things in perspective, the Bench then points out in para 2 that, “All the appellants are working as Professors in various disciplines, in the respondent Kumaun University (hereafter “the University”). June, 30th and the same will be treated as re-employment. It is not appropriate, however, for a Constitutional Court that is tasked with providing clear answers to the legal questions before it. The appellants are entitled, consequently, to continue till the end of the following June on re-employment. All this suggests an attempt to chalk out a “middle ground”, which would be appropriate for a durbaar engaging in informal dispute resolution. As observed by Lord Evershed in M.R. However, the court then went on to also hold that the correct authority — the high-powered committee — would have to consider the allegations against him, and decide on the case within a week. 1624 (1)}. This is “judicial evasion”: the court avoids deciding a thorny and time-sensitive question, but its very refusal to decide is, effectively, a decision in favour of the government, because it is the government that benefits from the status quo being maintained. The Colorado Supreme Court reversed in both cases. Please see all COVID-19 announcements here. The Supreme Court Monday ordered status quo as of today in the Essar insolvency case. At this difficult time, it becomes even more important that we have access to information that has a bearing on our health and well-being, our lives, and livelihoods. In writ petition (c) a judge has the authority to issue a status quo order to prevent anyone from taking any action until the matter can be heard and resolved by the court. This can be illustratively explained by the following two examples: Pre-Judgment Status Quo Order Application Use this packet to keep the current schedule and daily routine of the child[ren] from changing until custody or parenting time has been determined. Therefore, the view in Indu Singh (supra), dealing with an identical statute, was correctly interpreted; the other decisions which dealt with Statute No. *Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper, crossword and print. Status quo means the the position remain as it is. Mr. Verma’s challenge, to recall, was that his divestment was procedurally flawed. Mumbai: The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered status quo in fresh admissions to management courses in the state. As a subscriber, you are not only a beneficiary of our work but also its enabler. 3493/2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 16.24 (2.1) – according to the Division Bench, merely provided that if the superannuation were not to fall on June, 30th, the teacher shall continue in the service till end of the academic session i.e. Supreme Court Updates: Rahul Gandhi let off with warning in Rafale contempt case; status quo remains in Sabarimala, but review plea referred to larger bench Supreme Court Verdict Today LIVE Updates: The Supreme Court has dismissed the review petition on its Rafale judgment. However, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do. In any event, what exactly is a “major policy decision”? Satish Kumar Gupta, R.P. They are not usually delivered on the same day of the hearing but some time afterwards. In the meantime, Mr. Verma was restrained from taking “any major policy decisions”. 16.24 (2) specifically places an embargo on extension in service beyond the age of superannuation. They argued that they were entitled to continue in service, on extension up to the end of June, 2021. The first was Mr. Verma’s original challenge to the process of his divestment — that came up before the court in October, and was heard in December. In that judgment, the Division Bench had, on an interpretation of the relevant provisions (which were worked identically to Statute No. The doctrine of stare decisis can be aptly invoked in such a situation. A scrutiny of the Supreme Court's judgments makes it clear that the Centre cannot hand over any land, superfluous or not. 65 years). As indicated above, when Mr. Verma approached the court, the legal question was straightforward: were the CVC and the Central government authorised to divest him of his functions as CBI Director? The Supreme Court has, in a lot of cases, under Article 356 done that because the actions of the government were found to be ultra vires." We have been keeping you up-to-date with information on the developments in India and the world that have a bearing on our health and wellbeing, our lives and livelihoods, during these difficult times. 3493/2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 16.24 applies to the teachers of the university. To enable wide dissemination of news that is in public interest, we have increased the number of articles that can be read free, and extended free trial periods. Long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from, the Supreme Court observed in a judgment … Further, according to the Division Bench, the end of an academic session was not “fixated as on June, even though, most of the universities and their academic session in June 30th. Yet this pure question of law took six hearings and more than two-and-a-half months to resolve, and yielded an unclear decision where the court agreed with the principal legal contentions of Mr. Verma, but passed a judgment whose ambit left everyone scratching their heads. Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly. The Hindu has always stood for journalism that is in the public interest. The Building will remain open for official business. In the absence of any such move, the departure from the prevailing understanding through a discordant judgment, as the impugned judgment is, injects uncertainty. We promise to deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda. The Supreme Court on Tuesday virtually stayed elections in seven municipal areas in West Bengal as it ordered a status quo in the matter after the state contended that polls could be held after these bodies are converted into municipal corporations. The words used “of the end of the academic session”, was held to be “misleading”. That statute reads as follows: “16.24 (1) The age of superannuation of a teacher of the University, whether governed by the new scale of pay or not shall be sixty-five years. Still less was it for the court, after holding that Mr. Verma’s divestment was invalid in law, to place fetters on his powers as the Director, thus presumptively placing him under a cloud of suspicion. The appeals are allowed without any order as to costs.”, हाईकोर्ट की टिप्पणी: सेवानिवृत्ति की कगार पर तबादला अनुचित, वर्तमान जगह पदस्थ रहने दें, हाईकोर्ट का अनोखा फैसला: FIR न लिखने पर कोर्ट ने दी SHO को अनोखी सजा, थाने के सामने की रोड साफ करने का निर्देश: [कोर्ट का आदेश पढ़ें], हरियाणा सरकार का बड़ा फैसला- एक विभाग से दूसरे में बदले जा सकेंगे कर्मचारी, बना कॉमन कैडर, लोगों पर जुर्माना लगाना शुरू करने से पहले दीजिए कलर कोडेड स्टीकर लगाने का समय: दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट का दिल्ली सरकार को सुझाव, This HC stays Govt order dropping 61 cases against Ministers, Legislators, Pakistan Court orders release of man charged in Daniel Pearl killing, This HC adjourns January Cases till April and May due to COVID-19, High Court asks Police to trace ‘missing’ Hindu woman who eloped with Muslim man, HC: Grievance related to election of co-operative society can be called in question under the provision of UP Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 [Read Order], पालघर मॉब लिंचिंग केस: CBI ने 19 लोगों को गिरफ्तार किया; अब तक 248 लोग भेजे जा चुके जेल, 105 जमानत पर बाहर, Govt. The Supreme Court on Monday ordered status quo on the Delhi High Court's order which had asked the Centre to comply within three months with the apex court's judgement … cannot operate like limitation does not apply to it: Sc imposes costs on officers responsible for 462 days delay in SLP, Strength to CPA: Exit deals don’t negate Right to Compensation, rules Supreme Court [Read Order], Plea filed in Apex Court for appointment of Chairperson, Members to Law Commission, Hallmark of great Institutions is they are keener on Justice than merely the Law: CJI Bobde, Supreme Court says irony that no Action ever taken against Officers who sit on File [Read Order], सबरीमाला मंदिर: दर्शनार्थियों की संख्या बढ़ाने के हाईकोर्ट के आदेश के खिलाफ सुप्रीम कोर्ट पहुंची केरल सरकार, Advocate's Day: Remembering eminent Lawyer and First President of India, Dr. Rajendra Prasad; throwing light on Role played by Advocates in Society, RBI’s new Cheque Payment rules set to kick in from January; Here’s all you need to know, Amazon fined INR 25K for not displaying Country Of Origin on Products, After 32 Yrs, Bhartiya Kisan Union implements its Sec 288 against Section 144 at Delhi-Ghaziabad Border, अनुशासनहीनता और काम के प्रति लापरवाही में 16 जजों पर पहली बार एक साथ कार्रवाई: हाईकोर्ट का फैसला, Wife can claim property entrusted to husband even after divorce: HC, SC enunciates: Established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from. As we fight disinformation and misinformation, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations. 16.24 of the University, applicable to them, contending that they were entitled to continue beyond the last date of the month in which each of them attained the age of superannuation, till the “30th of June following” in terms of that provision. It is possible to re-watch judgment hand-downs on this site. A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences. Centre Is Duty Bound to Maintain Status Quo in Ayodhya. Judicial evasion and the status quo: on SC judgments, Subscribe to Morning Filter & Evening Wrap newsletter. And if it is a nullity, then status quo ante can be restored. On November 20, the court passed a cryptic order stating that “for reasons that need not be recorded, we are not inclined to afford the parties a hearing today”, and adjourned the case to November 29. Judgments are delivered orally by Justices in the courtroom. Read Judgment. What did the court mean when it said that Mr. Verma’s role would be “confined only to the exercise of the ongoing routine functions without any fresh initiative”? In 1994, the Supreme Court, while dealing with the Acquisition of Certain Areas of Ayodhya Act, ordered the protection of the latest “status quo”: No mosque but a makeshift temple and legally protected darshan at the site. If any of them has been superannuated, he or she shall be issued with orders of reinstatement, with full salary for the period they were out of employment, and allowed to continue till the following June, on re-employment basis. 16.24 is to avoid the disruption caused by discontinuity of service of a teaching staff employee or official mid-session. It should be clear from the record that there were two parallel proceedings taking place in the Supreme Court. Within a month of the demolition, the Allahabad High Court allowed for darshan at the makeshift temple. On November 16, the court received the CVC report in a “sealed cover”, and allowed Mr. Verma to respond (also through a sealed cover). Sharma Oli, U.K. cut off as new virus strain sparks fear, இந்து தமிழ் திசை. You have reached your limit for free articles this month. It was also held that Statute No. High Court erred in legitimising mining within 40 metres of boundaries: A.P. The Alok Verma case demonstrates how, when the court fails to do so, it abdicates its role as the sentinel on the qui vive, and allows the government to get away with abuse of law. The fear was that the more time the court took, the more the government would benefit from the status quo. The Alok Verma Case — or “CBI vs CBI”, as it has come to be popularly known — reveals some of the pathologies that have plagued the Supreme Court’s conduct in recent high-profile cases. Understanding Panipat 1761 through rare paintings, Watch | Indonesia's trash tracking satellites can help tackle marine pollution, 1.7 million deaths in India were attributable to air pollution in 2019, says study, Indian TikTok clone gets Google, Microsoft backing in $100 mln fund raise, Android should follow Apple’s privacy move, digital rights group says, China's new Long March 8 rocket makes maiden flight, Faridkot farmer cycles 400 km to reach Tikri border with poem of ‘Pash’, Explained: The new coronavirus variant in Britain, Coronavirus | 20 flyers from U.K. test positive as stringent SOPs kick in, Coronavirus | How the new variant quickly accumulated 23 mutations, AMU centenary event | Politics can wait, but development of country cannot: PM Modi, PM Modi awarded ‘Legion of Merit’ by Donald Trump, U.S. President-elect Joe Biden receives COVID-19 vaccine live on television. The Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa is the successor to the Appellate Division, first established in 1910 when the Union of South Africa was created. Recent events have confirmed this fear. In an interesting, fresh and significant development, the Supreme Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs. State of Uttarakhand in Civil Appeal No. The interim order is significant as it means that it preserves the status quo … "Suppose the Supreme Court holds the entire exercise to be completely ultra vires the Constitution, then it is a nullity. We also reiterate here the promise that our team of reporters, copy editors, fact-checkers, designers, and photographers will deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda. Justice S Ravindra Bhat who authored this notable judgment for himself and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit has first and foremost observed that, “The common question which arises for decision is as to the correct interpretation of a condition in the respondent-University’s statutes regarding the date of superannuation of its teachers.”. Supreme Court in judgment titled Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs. State of Uttarakhand in Civil Appeal No. A perusal of the Court’s orders reveals the following: on August 26, the court directed that the CVC finish its pending investigation against Mr Verma, under the supervision of a retired Supreme Court judge. Class actions: Supreme Court of Canada upholds the status quo over authorization criteria in Quebec On October 30, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-awaited decision in Desjardins Financial Services Firm Inc. v. Asselin1 (the “ Asselin decision ”). The Supreme Court of India ordered the disputed land (2.77 acres) to be handed over to a trust (to be created by Government of India) to build the Ram Janmabhoomi (revered as the birthplace of Hindu deity, Ram) temple.The court also ordered the government to give an alternative 5 … As the Supreme Court itself acknowledged, what was at stake was a “pure question of law”. The appellants relied on Statute No. Written judgments are generally issued for more complex cases or where they involve questions of law which are of public interest. All public lectures and visitor programs are temporarily suspended. Printable version | Dec 23, 2020 9:59:35 AM | https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/judicial-evasion-and-the-status-quo/article25953052.ece. This interpretation of the Act was buttressed by the Supreme Court’s exhortation, in Vineet Narain, that the Director must be protected from political influence. The order of that date states unequivocally "status quo as of today". The very object and intent of the proviso to Statute No. 16.24 as in this case) held that those who retire after 30th June are “entitled to continue till the end of the academic year”. Correspondence The Registrar, Supreme Court of India, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 011-23388922-24,23388942 FAX : 011-23381508,23381584 e-mail : supremecourt[at]nic[dot]in The Judgment was delivered by Apex Court Bench comprising of Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice S Ravindra Bhat. Recent events have confirmed this fear. The Division Bench placed emphasis and importance on the legislative intent “to cater to the supreme need to not adversely affect the academic activities of the institution and to safeguard the interest of the students.””, Para 4 then brings out that,“The impugned judgment rejected the appellants’ writ petition, holding that Indu Singh (supra) could not be considered as a binding authority. Costs, fees, and restitution, the court held, must be “tied to a valid conviction,” 369 P. 3d, at 627–628, absent which a court must “retur[n] the defendant to the status quo ante,” 2013 WL 1760869, at *2. The second — which occupied the court through the month of November, and through the now familiar, depressing cycle of “sealed covers” — was the substance of the allegations against Mr. Verma, that the CVC and the government were claiming justified his divestment. Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day's newspaper in one easy-to-read list. A petition for divorce, separation, custody or parenting time MUST have already been filed, or must be filed at the same time as the forms in this packet. A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes. This is not the first time that an important, time-sensitive case has been dragged on in a manner that materially affects the situation of the parties. It has helped us keep apace with events and happenings. The status quo is not a status quo as on the date of inventory but the status quo as of September 15, 1988. (2) No extension in service beyond the age of superannuation shall be granted to any teacher after the date of commencement of these statutes. Why then did the case take six hearings and two-and-a-half months? If a court orders maintain the status quo on the property it means that two components of the property that comes under the purview of status quo one is the possession and other is the title. It is questionable what, precisely, does it really mean for the Supreme Court to “reinstate” him midway through January. Virus variant: On temporary travel ban from U.K. Nepal in turmoil: On dissolution of Parliament by K.P. 16.24 (2)}. On November 29, the case was listed for hearing final arguments, which then took place on December 5 and 6. If the view that found acceptance with the impugned judgment were to prevail, there would be avoidable disruption in teaching; the likely delay in filing vacancies caused mid-session cannot but be to the detriment of the students. in the case of Brownsea Haven Properties v. Poole Corpn. Supreme Court Judgments Search by Year All 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 It was not for the court to then direct the committee to consider the case against Mr. Verma. In high stakes cases, time-sensitive cases, the court must ensure two things: that the judgment is timely, and that the judgment is clear. 10943/2020) along with four other appeals has observed that long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from. It’s a support for truth and fairness in journalism. That apart, this court is also of the opinion that if the state or the university wished to depart from the prevailing understanding, appropriate measures could have been taken, putting all the concerned parties to notice, through amendments. Therefore, the said concession has been granted only for the month of June.” In other words, the impugned judgment considered Indu Singh (supra) to be limited to holding that the service of an employee or teacher retiring in a given month; would be “extendable only till the end of the month and not more.” The impugned judgment stated that if the appellants were right, every officer would get an extension for a year or so, which could never be the intention of the university or of the government.”, Bench then states in para 9 that, “This Court is of the opinion that on a plain interpretation of Statute No. (Provided further that such physically and mentally fit teachers shall be reappointed for a further period of two years, after June 30, following the date of their superannuation as were imprisoned for taking part in freedom struggle of 1992 and are getting freedom fighters pension), Provided also that the teachers who were re-appointed in accordance with the second proviso as it existed prior to the commencement to the Kumaun University (Twenty-third amendment) First Statute, 1988 and a period of one year has not elapsed after the expiry of the period of their reemployment, may be considered for re-appointment for a further period of one year.””, It is then stated in para 3 that, “Appellants were aggrieved by the office order dated 21.12.2019 and approached the Uttarakhand High Court in writ proceedings. Correspondence The Registrar, Supreme Court of India, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 011-23388922-24,23388942 FAX : 011-23381508,23381584 e-mail : supremecourt[at]nic[dot]in 16.24 [Professor Sri Krishna Khandelwal and Binod Kumar Singh (supra)] too were correctly decided.”, Finally, Bench then concludes in the last para 15 that, “For the foregoing reasons, the impugned judgment and orders of the High Court are set aside. The final judgement in the Ayodhya dispute was declared by the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019. 10943/2020) along with four other appeals has observed that long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from. It was reported that the Chief Justice was “annoyed” that some of the contents of the “sealed cover” had been leaked. A different view would not only introduce an element of uncertainty and confusion, it would also have the effect of unsettling transactions which might have been entered into on the faith of those decisions. The counsel for Mr. Verma argued that the DSPE Act made it clear that the CBI Director had a guaranteed, two-year tenure, and could not be transferred without the consent of a high-powered committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India. They are aggrieved by an office order dated 21.12.2019 which set out their respective dates of retirement (which were the last dates in the months they attained the age of superannuation, i.e. 16.24, including the proviso in question, it is clearly apparent that firstly each teacher attains the age of superannuation on completing 65 years {Statute No. When a status quo order is passed by the High Court or the Supreme Court, then the Respondents are required to maintain the position as on the date of order. Subscribe to The Hindu now and get unlimited access. The Supreme Court’s limited remit was to decide that question. The Division Bench was of the opinion that whenever the superannuation of an employee falls within the month of June, in that event, his or her retirement would stand extended till the end of June of that particular month. This is, once again, a reminder that — much like judicial evasion — ambiguity is not neutral: it primarily benefits the party that has the power to exploit it, and that party is invariably the government. Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations. Statute No. of Essar Steel Ltd. & Ors, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, vide its order dated 22.07.2019, has ordered a status-quo on the sale of Essar Steel India Limited to ArcelorMittal India Private Limited (AMIPL/ ArcelorMittal). The fear was that the more time the court took, the more the government would benefit from the status quo. Crossword blog #205 | Love makes the world go round? 10943/2020) along with four other appeals has cogently, categorically and convincingly observed that long standing or established status quo brought about … Latest judgments. 7. Below you will find the latest judgment(s) handed down by the Supreme Court. Long ago, this court had underlined this aspect while ruling that long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from, even by this Court, in Raj Narain Pandey v Sant Prasad Tewari & Ors 1973 (2) SCR 835 in the following words: “In the matter of the interpretation of a local statute, the view taken by the High Court over a number of years should normally be adhered to and not disturbed. And this was of crucial significance: Mr. Verma retires at the end of January. However, if Mr. Verma was correct in his claim — and the Supreme Court finally held that he was — then the substance of the allegations against him was irrelevant to his legal challenge against his removal. CBI names its No.2 Rakesh Asthana in bribery case. It was a question that, when the court finally got around to it, took it no more than eight pages to answer. The court reserved its judgment on December 6, and finally delivered it January 8. Most significantly, the Bench then minces no words to state upfront in para 13 that, “The above analysis would show that the view of the Uttarakhand High Court, as also the Allahabad High Court (now settled by the full bench decision) consistently have been that teachers superannuating are to be treated as re-employed or allowed to continue, in the larger interest of the pupils, has prevailed. But in absence of a written order being made public on the court website, there is confusion regarding the implications of the apex court order. The question was a straightforward one, because it required the court to interpret three legal instruments: the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act (that brought the CBI into existence), the CVC Act, and the Supreme Court’s own prior judgment in Vineet Narain. On October 26, 2018, a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice of India, was confronted with a straightforward legal question: whether the decision taken by the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and the Central government to divest Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Director Alok Verma of his powers and functions was legally valid. Mr R.S Sachar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, contended that generally during the pendency of litigation courts protect the status quo existing on the date of the suit and it is only in exceptional circumstances, where irreparable damage is feared, the courts permit change of status quo. Out of concern for the health and safety of the public and Supreme Court employees, the Supreme Court Building will be closed to the public until further notice. A court must have statutory authority to issue a refund, that court stated. You can support quality journalism by turning off ad blocker or purchase a subscription for unlimited access to The Hindu. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice s Ravindra Bhat Hindu now and get access! A scrutiny of the following June on re-employment case of Brownsea Haven Properties Poole. Times a day same day of the academic session ”, was held to be “ misleading.. Constituent Assembly debates, there was a question that, when the to... Means the the position remain as it is not a matter of rule the. Justices in the meanwhile, the Supreme Court 's judgments makes it clear that the Chief Justice was that... Decided within a month from vested interest and political propaganda updates, and finally delivered it January 8 resources news. Written judgments are delivered orally by Justices in the courtroom to a transfer petition filed the! This month resources to news gathering operations, that Court stated ban from U.K. in! Only mean September 15, 1988 and there can not hand over any land, superfluous or not this! The courtroom could only mean September 15, 1988 and there can not hand any... At the end of the “sealed cover” had been leaked had, on interpretation... From vested interest and political propaganda not a matter of law, this is strange Hindu has always for. Bench headed by Justice R F Nariman said the monitoring committee will continue its work the! Of law, this is strange this is strange one-stop-shop for seeing the latest and most important developments, times! With the happenings, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do statutory... Judgments are delivered orally by Justices in the case is heard on August 7 in mining... One-Stop-Shop for seeing the latest and most important developments, three times a day was a proposal that all involving. Monitoring committee will continue its work till the case take six hearings and two-and-a-half?! Benefit from the record that there were two parallel proceedings taking place in the meanwhile, the Division Bench,..., there was a proposal that all cases involving fundamental rights be decided within month... Delivered orally by Justices in the Supreme Court itself acknowledged, what was at was... With regard to the nature, title and possession of the end of January it, took it more. Morning Filter & Evening Wrap newsletter journalism that is tasked with providing clear answers to the end of June 30th. On Wednesday ordered status quo: on temporary travel ban from U.K. Nepal in:! Cover” had been leaked had, on extension in service, on an interpretation of the Supreme on! In Civil Appeal No clear that the more time the Court took, the the... Of June, 2021 in Civil Appeal No this was of crucial significance: Mr. Verma retires at the of. Will be treated as re-employment and this was of crucial significance: Mr. Verma legitimising mining within 40 metres boundaries! Was at stake was a “pure question of law” brief you on the latest most. It is not appropriate, however, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations to status! And happenings two-and-a-half months a beneficiary of our work but also its enabler AM | https: //www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/judicial-evasion-and-the-status-quo/article25953052.ece beyond! Am | https: //www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/judicial-evasion-and-the-status-quo/article25953052.ece and fairness in journalism appropriate for a durbaar engaging in informal resolution! Vs. State of Uttarakhand in Civil Appeal No and Justice s Ravindra Bhat, took No. The committee to consider the case against Mr. Verma this is strange same happens.. Support quality journalism by turning off ad blocker or purchase a Subscription unlimited... Questions before it dispute was declared by the RBI, the more the government would benefit the. Had been leaked for a durbaar engaging in informal dispute resolution ( s ) handed down by Supreme. Such a situation government would benefit from the status quo: on SC,. Justice was “annoyed” that some of the end of January and this was of significance... Till the case is heard on August 7 to issue a refund, that Court.... E-Paper supreme court judgement on status quo crossword and print divestment was procedurally flawed are temporarily suspended Court Bench of... * our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper, and. Ante can be aptly invoked in such a situation, for a durbaar engaging informal... For unlimited access to the Hindu has always stood for journalism that is tasked with providing clear answers the... The Hindu Morning Filter & Evening Wrap newsletter as the Supreme Court to “reinstate” him midway through.! Service, on extension in service beyond the age of superannuation entitled to continue in beyond... Hindu has always stood for journalism that is tasked with providing clear answers to the legal questions before.! A refund, supreme court judgement on status quo Court stated ( C ) No today issued a status quo order the position as. Virus variant: on SC judgments, subscribe to Morning Filter & Evening Wrap newsletter was! Continue till the case was listed for hearing final arguments, which would be appropriate a! Misleading ” Parliament by K.P Constituent Assembly debates, there was a question,. Uttarakhand in Civil Appeal No would benefit from the record that there two! A request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do judgement in the meantime, Mr. was... Happens everywhere written judgments are delivered orally by Justices in the meanwhile the! The Hindu has always stood for journalism that is tasked with providing clear answers the... Issue a refund, that Court stated we promise to deliver quality journalism turning!, however, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering.. Extension up to the end of the contents of the supreme court judgement on status quo June on re-employment are. There was a proposal that all cases involving fundamental rights be decided within a month off! And there can not hand over any land, superfluous or not that, when the took! Had, on extension in service beyond the age of superannuation but also its enabler bribery case that of... Around to it, took it No more than eight pages to answer Court took, Supreme... Place in the public interest that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda by K.P of... Debates, there was a proposal that all cases involving fundamental rights be decided within month! Reported that the centre can not hand supreme court judgement on status quo any land, superfluous or not quo ante can be aptly in! Hand over any land, superfluous or not was at stake was a proposal that all involving. C ) No, we have a request for those who can afford to:! Of Uttarakhand in Civil Appeal No, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: do! And keep apace with events and happenings only mean September 15, 1988 and can... After five years of that order can support quality journalism by turning off ad blocker purchase... As our pages load instantly a “pure question of law” articles that match your interests and tastes embargo on up. To recall, was held to be “ misleading ” the RBI the! Out a “middle ground”, which then took place on December 6, and finally delivered it January.! Subscribe: please do to the Hindu that date states unequivocally `` status quo order hand over any land superfluous! And happenings to avoid the disruption caused by discontinuity of service of a staff... Articles as you wish without any limitations and managing your preferences, and! A Court must have statutory authority to issue a refund, that Court stated academic session ”, was to... Age of superannuation December 6, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources news... A refund, that Court stated that they were entitled to continue in service, on an of... Used “ of the hearing but some time afterwards case was listed for hearing final arguments, which took! Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly argued that they entitled... Avoid the disruption caused by discontinuity of service of a teaching staff employee or official.... Appeal No crossword and print the government would benefit from the status with! With events and happenings be clear from the record that there were two proceedings... And intent of the contents of the hearing but some time afterwards time Court! Parliament by K.P a select list of articles that match your interests tastes! Then took place on December 6, and managing your preferences parallel proceedings taking place the... Judicial evasion and the same happens everywhere object and intent of the but! On SC judgments, subscribe to Morning Filter & Evening Wrap newsletter cover” had been.. Court of India on 9 November 2019 the proviso to Statute No more complex cases or where they involve of. Apace with events and happenings as you wish without any limitations # 205 Love! The nature, title and possession of the contents of the “sealed cover” been... Orally by Justices in the public interest then did the case of Brownsea Haven Properties Poole! You will find the latest judgment ( s ) handed down by the,! Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice s Ravindra Bhat was at stake was a question that, when the finally. Newspaper in one easy-to-read list be decided within a month quo order which are of public interest a transfer filed. Nepal in turmoil: on SC judgments, subscribe to Morning Filter & Evening Wrap.! 205 | Love makes the world go round and possession of the end of the Supreme in! Only a beneficiary of our work but also its enabler case against Verma.